About Me

Name: Duck Archer
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Republicans To Blame? Yup.

 Republicans, under Newt Gingrich's conservative principles, shored up the American economy.  Republicans, under G.W.Bush's 'compassionate conservative' principles, have damaged the American economy.  Compassionate Conservatism is little more than Liberal Lite, and nearly as damaging to economics, self-esteem, and morals. 
 
Compassionate Conservatism's successes:
 - dramatic (40%) growth in federal non-defense spending, nearly all the increase in DC spending since 2002
 - dramatic increased reach of the federal government into medicines:  he who pays the bills calls the shots
 - dramatic increase in power for NEA, meaning more centralized DC control over kids' education, not less; so we get lie-filled curriculum spanning
    - - from environment (Inconvenient Truth movie in the classrooms)  
    - - to morality (with a struggle to get abstinence even included in Sex Education)
 - dramatic abandonment of science in favor of emotion, leading to  
    - - population-increasing Polar Bears being added to the threatened species lists,  
    - - abandonment of Americans in favor of supporting environmentalist lies about Global Warming, despite the science showing Earth's stayed constant since 1979, warmed in 1998 (El Nino year), and cooled since then.
    - - ever more companies making bad business decisions to placate politicians, and the environmentalists they've lent ear towards, now that the President has surrendered the businessman's last political cover
 - dramatic political losses in 2006, among Liberal Lite Republicans, because they abandoned the people who elected them ... after garnering only tepid acceptance in the first place, with all that "compassionate conservatism" that hardly intersected conservative principles.
 
At least 'compassionate conservatism' gave us solid conservative stands on national defense, right to life, and interpretive mindsets in new Supreme Court justices.
 
The Obama-Biden ticket won't fix these dramatic problems.  Again, they're Liberal, and we've had years of Liberal Lite.  So let's indeed hope & trust that McCain-Palin indeed isn't another term of Bush -- and let's hold that ticket acountable for promises of change!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Ahh, now retired, free to advocate CO2 reductions"

As a retiree from 20 years in the U.S. armed forces, I am finally free to do certain political things.  Here's one.

Like my President, and the presidential hopefuls, I now campaign to reduce carbon footprints. Please read on to know why.

Maybe you will also achieve a proper awareness, as I now enjoy.

Unlike most of my fellow Global Warming High Priests, I will use my military training and lead by example -- lead from the front. Thus I leverage time-tested battlefield leadership principles. Only in this way, can our movement (Gaia Be Praised!) overcome stubborn unbelievers, pitiful nationalism, bothersome logic, inconvenient truths, reformation superstitions, patriarchal dictators, ignorant mirror-imaging, foolish Image Of God thinking, and contrary evidence.

1.  Executive Summary.
 
CO2 (carbon dioxide) is our current favorite-villain greenhouse gas.  Fortunately (Gaia Be Praised!) it doesn't stink as much as methane. I'd have hated to be a Global Warmist back then when methane was the villain.
 
Each human breath converts oxygen to carbon dioxide. Deeper breathing means even more CO2.  Indeed, we fight quantity as well as frequency.
 
Simple Solution. I vow to breathe less, and lead others to the same righteous lifestyle. It requires just one simple lifestyle change.
 
2.  The Problem.
 
Exercise is the CO2 factory. Exercising requires the body to burn more energy and race to a higher metabolic state. Worse, the exercise-lean body operates at a higher metabolic rate. All this metabolizing requires more oxygen, more breathing. Hence the body is duped into making more CO2 even between exercise sessions. All this activity heats up Mother Gaia! A smokestack-era 'exercise mentality' requires more breathing, and bigger, deeper breathing at that.
 
On active duty, I was compelled to exercise; often, rather a lot. As a retiree, however, I can use parts of my military training as anti-examples.
 
3.  How To Do It!
 
Now I, not Uncle Sam, own my body. As a retiree, a normal civilian, I can be master of my own mind. As a normal civilian, I can now decide do my part.

I will change my mindset. I will cease exercising. I will live as a sloth, hardly breathing either with quantity or depth. I will even devise methods to reduce the times that I must breathe deeply to get up onto my feet. With these simple changes of heart, mind, and works, I will reduce my personal carbon footprint to 1975 levels -- the quantity from the small lungs of a pre-pubescent eleven-year-old!

4.  Like Rolling Downhill.
Advertising is always the issue. How, indeed, do we get heard in an advertising-saturated society, where even 'news' is blared 24/7 alongside real & meaningful news of the latest development in a cute blonde co-ed's murder investigation? The answer is 'antipode': speak softly, and convey a big solution. I will quietly proclaim this exercise-shunning path to planetary salvation; quietly, so as to not excite myself nor anybody else.  (Remember, 'lead from the front'.) Quiet is calm. My metabolism relaxes further than by sloth alone. My very quiet example will catch attention simply because of its uniqueness. I will literally show others, quietly, meekly, The Way to a planet freer of greenhouse gasses. All will see how I reduced my personal carbon footprint to 1965 levels -- to the quantity of a one-year-old! Soon, with millions of shallow breathing converts, even our own bodies will convert and fight for us: our peacefully quiet sloth will commence to even make it hard to exercise and breathe deeply. It's a win-win situation: down with resource-abusing competition, up with glorious 'let-it-be' cooperation, comrades!

We need not worry about the Law of Unintended Consequences. As we all commence to dramatically reduce exercising and all the needless exertions required by the wasteful condition of being physically active, we will all breathe less. Even our enemies will find themselves reduced to the state of useful idiots as they unconsciously begin to breathe less: we will allow them freedom from overly exerting as they conquer us blissful pacifists contemplating our TVs. We will be in a glorious cycle, with our bodies working in harmony with our minds, and even our enemies ignorantly following along, Gaia Be Praised! This cycle will result in people of the whole world wholly converting to a sedentary lifestyle. It will usher in an age of Aquarius: a true planet-wide salvation!

In no time, we will all achieve pork-out. Soon, our slow & shallow breathing will help reduce CO2 so far that even allow Mother Earth will chill out! As we enter a state incapable of growing our own food, Mother Earth will slip into the cozy slumber of our next Ice Age. We will simply wait out the chill, living off the fat of our own bodies. Nature (Gaia Be Praised!) will recover balance, as all species will be free to recover from extinction. With advertising & example both as easy as rolling down a hill (without breathing), we will achieve harmony in the Universe!

5.  Conclusion.
It's glorious, now retired from the military, finding myself finally able to be politically active about post-modern Gaia-loving inactivity!

Chill Out and Save Mother Earth!!! (Shush! Quietly!)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

5 Global Warming Questions

 

I offer five questions. Logically answering them should prove a basis for waking up to environmentalism’s smoke’n’mirrors:

1.  If man caused global warming, then why did the globe start to warm BEFORE the industrial revolution began?

2.  If man is exacerbating global warming, then why do finally-corrected NASA global temperatures show 1998 was the warmest year, when the decade since '98 has seen more pollution than ever -- and from East Asian industrializing, which is essentially immune to Global Warmist “solutions”?

3.  If the USA has such a huge environmental disaster, then why was it only in Korea, immediately downwind from China, that I couldn’t see the sun, nor even a brighter-than-the-rest spot in the sky, on a clear day?

4. Since the 1960s-technology Trans-Alaska Pipeline (and Prudhoe Bay wells) has been such an environmentally-friendly project for all these decades, what possible legitimate objection can exist, to drilling ANWAR with 1990s+ technology?

And I have the BIG question.  It reacts to actions by General Electric, airlines, and most other major corporations, ‘going green’ in the wake of President Bush removing their last political protection against environazis: 

5. What will it take to get President Bush to return to his sensible resistance to the global warmist fanatics?

Those five questions illustrate how President Bush has snatched defeat in 2006-8, from his 2004 victory over Al Gore.  Do we have Son of ‘No New Taxes’ ?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »